www.IRC-Junkie.org Forum Index
The future of DALnet...

?
Post new topic???Reply to topic ???www.IRC-Junkie.org Forum Index -> General IRC Chat
View previous topic :: View next topic ?
Author Message
v0rtexio



Joined: 01 Feb 2005
Posts: 62
Location: worcester

PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 4:05 am?? ?Post subject: The future of DALnet... Reply with quote

On a more serious note,

I just wanted some feedback on where you guys think the infamous DALnet is going - will the banning of FDC class C ips bring a new wave of ddos attacks to the network? will it be detrimental on how people view dalnet? heres my view...

DALnet has always been a network i have personally avoided, although i have ventured into DAL-Land on few occasions, where i have not liked what i have seen... Going from one of the 3 top networks and strongly enforcing a network wide TOS - leads me to the penultimate questions... have they left it too late for them to do this? Is there reputation already tarnished?

anyways - i do my best to stay away from dalnet due to its reputation of underage porn and xxx channels... can dal do something more to prevent this, or are all bigger networks ran without morals ?

I do admire dalnet in a way however for this banning, but there are other way of stopping harmful bots than banning ISPs !


Peace
_________________
http://v0rtex.org
Amazing Website - Go post on the forums!! Very Happy woo

http://thebuild.webdesigngroup.net
ONLINE RADIO - THURSDAYS FROM 7 - 8PM GMT
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website



_dood_



Joined: 07 Mar 2005
Posts: 21
Location: United Kingdom

PostPosted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 9:25 pm?? ?Post subject: DALnets "demise" Reply with quote

I personally love DALnet. Its one the only large networks that I trust because of the services it has to offer.

The Denial of Service attacks caused a huge downward spiral in its user base as confidence was destroyed for many users. I was not witness to this so I cant comment but from what I have seen I am impressed.

As far as the underage pornography and XXX channels are concerned this is a common hazard for any large network. DALnet does not endorse child pornography however, and I'm very certain that nobody working for them would be pleased to know that users were on their network for that purpose alone. DCC is anonymous and unmoderated at the best of times so its down to the users own seedy mind.
_________________
AfflictNet Administrator
#afflictnet @ AfflictNet
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Mentality



Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 32

PostPosted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 10:14 pm?? ?Post subject: Reply with quote

DALnet has been my home network since I started using IRC, I saw the DDoS attacks and they were handled very well, both by the DALnet staff and the regular users of DALnet. Whilst a lot of negatives were spurted towards the network, admiration has to be felt towards the strong sense of community that came out of the attacks.

Then of course, what many think was a bad move (I personally think every network should follow suit), they banned file sharing, also contributing to their large userbase downfall. Having spoken to a number of opers in the past about this however, they are quite pleased - the rate at which DALnet was growing and the abuse they had to handle because of this was ridiculous. As a user, I feel the network is better for it too.

As a note, I believe DALnet have closed channels which give out XXX passwords. Sex chat is something IRC can be used for, whilst I don't frequent the channels myself, I don't see it as a "bad" thing. Child pornography distribution would break the AUP as no mass file sharing is allowed, so they don't allow those either. What's more, it is against their AUP:

"All clients connecting to DALnet must agree to refrain from using DALnet to engage in illegal activities, including the transfer of "warez" or "kiddie porn"."

Unfortunately, I assume like any IRC network, it has far too much politics, it also has its fair share of arrogant opers and, as I have experience on two other IRC networks, it seems to me DALnet has more than other networks. To be honest, it seems that opers have their very own community separate from almost every normal user of DALnet, and if you fall out with one of them, you are branded by all of them. I don't think DALnet succeeds in its opers being a part of the community. They help a lot, but it's all so stiff and formal, which does nothing for their aim at being the friendliest IRC network. I do think it achieved this in the past though but has been weeded out through years of growth, gaining of admins, gaining of admin's friends, eventually leading to what I perceive today as elitism. Whilst ranting, I want to also note there are some wonderful exceptions, and those people do a fantastic job.

Anyway, , what do I think the future of DALnet is? Well, I think this whole IX concept is brilliant, and its main co-ordinators (more specifically, Ahnberg) has been brilliant and exceedingly patient in explaining this process to anyone who asks (including myself). I don't think it's going to grow much bigger, nor do I think it wants to though. However, for the users who currently exist, and for the few who do set up a new home there, I think it will be a very enjoyable experience. Since the attacks a couple of years back, there has been a HUGE decline in the number of netsplits and Services outages, I rarely see it at all. I don't think this FDCServers akill will bring any DDoS attacks, and if it does, it won't be that detrimental - in the few days they have been akilled, as I said, I have seen no netsplits or anything else indicating massive attacks that a user would be affected by.

Whew.

Edit: Oh, and the number of times a thread has been posted titled "The future of DALnet?", "is DALnet going to die?" is ridiculous, none of those times has DALnet died (obviously), but nevertheless, it's a fun opportunity to share my opinion!

Regards,
_________________
Mentality/Chris
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
mite



Joined: 30 Oct 2004
Posts: 107

PostPosted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 4:56 am?? ?Post subject: Reply with quote

I've wandered into a few DALnet channels in the past...

Each time I connected, I was turned away by the channels I found other users in by /whois'ing at random. A large number of 'normal' DALnet users seem to occupy pornography and other sex related channels.

SearchIRC.com wrote:
Undernet - 107,536 users in 47,751 channels
DALnet - 27,015 users in 14,730 channels


As you can see, Undernet has over 3 times as many channels and users as DALnet. On DALnet, 388 indexed channels contain the term "sex" somewhere in the name or topic. On Undernet, 410. Two very close numbers for two very differently sized networks. This was also provided by SearchIRC.com.

I don't know about the 30,000 users that are connected to DALnet, but I do know that a network like this is just not my type of place. I base this opinion on my limited personal experiance, the word of my peers, and some simple facts.

I suppose it's pretty unavoidable for DALnet though, seeing as it has a reputation for housing these type of channels. The type of users seeking sex related IRC will naturally flock to the network. Despite this, they do appear to be doing something about it.

It must also be admitted that 100% of any community never agrees or conforms to the opinions and actions of their peers. I am certain that there are good places to be on DALnet.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hardy



Joined: 06 Nov 2004
Posts: 3
Location: Kongsberg, Norway

PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 1:05 am?? ?Post subject: Reply with quote

One comment i have is, their new IX system to irc-servers will probably make the network alot stronger then most others if shit hits the fan later on, however to administrate it and making sure the major internet exchanges has a dalnet server/peering will be a hell of a job i dont envy them...

And i have to say i think efnet`s strategy of demanding more of the provider hosting the server in ddos filters, shitload of bandwith and a solid network vs. the way some ...other.. major irc-networks do it by just looking at the admin when linking (offcourse the server have to match minimum requirements also.. ) is what makes efnet strong, and what some of the other top 5 networks really lack.
_________________
Anders Hardangen / Hardy @ IRC
EFnet admin: irc.mzima.net & irc.igs.ca
Newsjunkie: www.efnet.info & www.irc-junkie.org
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
x



Joined: 27 Oct 2004
Posts: 43
Location: ireland

PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 3:46 pm?? ?Post subject: Reply with quote

the New IX servers.. whats the difference from the normal servers?

to me Dalnet will always be my home .. it has what i need good chans , Decent opers , and Services its all im looking for really.
I Tried other networks efnet and undernet and some other net but they didnt have jack shit on Dalnet when compared.. yes it has more "chans" and "people" but iv noticed they IDLE alot more on efnet and undernet then they do on Dalnet .. you could say i dont come on at the same times as everyone but i found that to bullshit since im on a hell of alot.

Im amazed Dalnet has lived this long even through the Ddos attacks ..Whatever happened to the ddosers during that big attack in December?.. did they just give up?

in your remark about knowing ircopers and "elitism" i'd say you couldnt be more 100% right. There are a few Decent Ircopers that are willing to help but most of em keep to themselves

basically i'd say mentalities(sp) post has hit on the nail
Good post Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Stefano



Joined: 01 May 2005
Posts: 34
Location: Beirut

PostPosted: Mon May 23, 2005 10:08 pm?? ?Post subject: Reply with quote

if undernet is somehow today is big, is also because of the failure of dalnet. i myself am a dalnet user from 1997 till 2000. when dalnet crashed. we #france moved to undernet and i never came back because i found on undernet peace which i couldnt find on dalnet. (plus not being able to hide his vhost on dalnet provided lot of problems. i use to get packet often by some kidos just for not voicing them... (for example))

today i just want to show lebanon as example. this a tinny country yeah? ok.. #Lebanon dalnet is closed. cityshells.net main lebanese shells company glined. as we all know in lebanon they have cables and 4 5 neibours share the same ip.. so if 10 users are online from a street the whole city is unable to conect.. now tell me how do u want lebanese people to join dalnet?..
so.. -1000 users for dalnet
+ 1000 for undernet.
tiny example...
_________________
Administrator @ Beirut IRC Network
Webmaster @ Beirut Scripts
DJ @ Beirut Radio
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
katsklaw



Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 128
Location: irc.nfinate-irc.org

PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2005 1:50 am?? ?Post subject: Re: The future of DALnet... Reply with quote

v0rtexio wrote:
On a more serious note,

I just wanted some feedback on where you guys think the infamous DALnet is going - will the banning of FDC class C ips bring a new wave of ddos attacks to the network? will it be detrimental on how people view dalnet? heres my view...


Banning Class C IP blocks is nothing new, nor is it limited to just DALnet. You should read more IRC news if you think I'm mistaken. DALnet default akill lasts 30 minutes. Anything longer the users/ISP has done something to deserve it.

DALnet has come a long way in those 10 years and go farther every day. No other has pioneered a style of services as popular as *Serv style Services, guess what? .. DALnet invented it.

IRCop issues were a hot topic in the late 90's, you couldn't find one if you tried. I was a Services Admin on DALnet then and I had problems finding one. They fixed that issue as with hundreds of other user issues.

Quote:

DALnet has always been a network i have personally avoided, although i have ventured into DAL-Land on few occasions, where i have not liked what i have seen... Going from one of the 3 top networks and strongly enforcing a network wide TOS - leads me to the penultimate questions... have they left it too late for them to do this? Is there reputation already tarnished?


Network wide TOS? Every network has a TOS .. including the ISP you use now and I bet they "strongly enforce" it too. Nothing is too late, DALnet is growing, slowing I admit ..but growing none the less.

Quote:

anyways - i do my best to stay away from dalnet due to its reputation of underage porn and xxx channels... can dal do something more to prevent this, or are all bigger networks ran without morals ?


Undernet, rizon, EFnet all have underage porn and xxx channels. Why are you singling out DALnet?

Besides after decade on DALnet I can claim that such channels aren't an issue if you just simply stay away from them. I've never been in one and that's the honest truth.

Just as a side note, when IRC was invented it was an unmoderated medium .... that was 1988 .. today in 2005 it's still an unmoderated medium. Meaning you have been warned from day one that you may see questionable content on IRC. Nothing has changed ... nothing is hidden. No one is forcing you to use IRC nor forcing you to view unfiltered channel lists.

Quote:

I do admire dalnet in a way however for this banning, but there are other way of stopping harmful bots than banning ISPs !


Peace


That's good that you admire them .. they are pioneering yet another trend first on IRC!

DALnet like all other networks are run by admins that privately own their servers and grant limited public access. It is out of their generous graces that you even have a place to chat. No one is paid for such a service and no one forced the admins to do this. If all the free irc servers closed right now .. IRC would be dead by morning. IRC in general has always reserved the right to refuse connections to anyone for any reason ... even if that reason is no reason at all.

People all too easily forget this and think that an explaination is owed .. it's not. Yes, I agree it's good PR to do so .. but please remember that it's not required by any means.

Quote:

cityshells.net main lebanese shells company glined. as we all know in lebanon they have cables and 4 5 neibours share the same ip.. so if 10 users are online from a street the whole city is unable to conect..


It's as simple as telling DALnet that your not clones ... your ISP has to tell them .. not you.

There is such thing as session exceptions. Session exceptions (DALnet calls them "triggers") Have existed for at least 7 years.

Also expect to be akilled(glined) if numerous users abuse DALnet services and your ISP ignored DALnet's request for intervention.. so your ISP may not have been banned for cloning.

Quote:

As you can see, Undernet has over 3 times as many channels and users as DALnet. On DALnet, 388 indexed channels contain the term "sex" somewhere in the name or topic. On Undernet, 410.


Sex means sex in English sure enough, but is a common word in other languages plus the word fragment of sex appears in completely harmless words such as sextillion and essex.

Also lets not forget that when it comes to porn, it's not illegal in most countries. Granted, almost all countries forbid child porn but many forms of porn such as beastiality are legal in other countries. Are we to tell everyone that we must forbid something just because it's illegal in the USA or some other country?

That aside lets talk about *ALL* questionable material .. not just sex/porn channels .. how many warez/xdcc channels are there on Undernet? What about Rizon? or IRCNet? I'll even use your resource, mite (searchirc.com)

Granted, not all countries honor the US Copyright model however very few countries are without copyright laws and those that do have them resemble the USA copyright model. So copyright laws are far more uniform and widely spread across the globe than porn laws.

Undernet Top 5:
Largest 5 channels / users
#mp3passion (1016)
#mp3_collective (869)
#mp3download (673)
#fast-warez (673)
#constanta (578)

DALNet Top 5:
#jakarta (415)
#bandung (412)
#kampung (360)
#Karachi (359)
#zurna (300)

Rizon Top 5:
#extreme-moviez (3107)
#mob (1826)
#rap-albums (1444)
#0sec-wares (1396)
#elite-xdcc (1396)

IRCNet top 5:
#dj-slo (141)
#no1 (81)
#tasso (72)
#aco (65)
#funk00l (65)

EFNet top 5:
#lost.no (787)
#GANGSTA-VIBEZ (780)
#riddim_ryder (670)
#xbox (639)
#smallville.no (634)

QuakeNet top 5:
#2on2 (1303)
#pcw (1289)
#5on5 (1220)
#spielersuche (1066)
#matsi (1041)

4 out of 5 of the most popular channels on Undernet appear to contain questionable material. NONE of the top 5 on DALnet!

Do a complete, unfiltered, alphabeticaly ordered channel list on Undernet and the 3rd channel on the list at this moment has something to do with inbreeding.

It doesn't matter if you dislike DALnet or not, we each have our vices but what sets me off is when someone says they don't like DALnet because "reason X" and the net they are on has just as much if not more "reason X" than DALnet!

I don't care if you point fingers. DALnet isn't perfect and I'll never claim that it is, just point fingers in the correct direction and for the correct reason. Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Stefano



Joined: 01 May 2005
Posts: 34
Location: Beirut

PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 4:07 pm?? ?Post subject: Reply with quote

you know.. go to DALnet you will notice most of the users are from
paskistan, indian, indonesia, arabia .. asians/orientals
you go to undernet.. canadians americans romanians.. westerns
maybe this is it. simply western people are better at irc then the orientals
just like in real life..

its just irc theorie that we can maybe consider
_________________
Administrator @ Beirut IRC Network
Webmaster @ Beirut Scripts
DJ @ Beirut Radio
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
computerdude



Joined: 10 Jul 2005
Posts: 4
Location: Next Door

PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 12:54 am?? ?Post subject: Dead Reply with quote

I've never liked DalNET for as long as I can think. I wouldn't really care if the network died or not.
_________________
Thanks,
Travis
irc://irc.geek-101.com/main
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Stefano



Joined: 01 May 2005
Posts: 34
Location: Beirut

PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 6:29 am?? ?Post subject: Reply with quote

when u download mirc.exe and u wana connect it randomly gives u like 5 networks most of the time its efnet dalnet as i noticed
so i dont know how many noobs download mirc per year
but i imagin if 1/5 lands on dalnet
whatever hapens the network cant die
maybe yes some oldies move to some other places but wont just die.

i infact would link dalnet to mirc, its just the reflect image of mirc.
if dalnet its shows that irc is too.. in fact it is and we all know it
but we are like cursed people we just want to stay here till the end..
i got a new pc , i had paltalk in it.. i asked the guy hey where is mirc , he said what?
see..
_________________
Administrator @ Beirut IRC Network
Webmaster @ Beirut Scripts
DJ @ Beirut Radio
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous: ??
Post new topic???Reply to topic ???www.IRC-Junkie.org Forum Index -> General IRC Chat All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

?
Jump to:??
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB ? 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Download movie | Komputery Gorz?ƒ³w | Buy Anything On eBay | Download movie | VHS shop